Wednesday, January 12

Who is responsible?

"Acts of monstrous criminality stand on their own. They begin and end with the criminals who commit them -- not collectively with all the citizens of the state..." ~ Sarah Palin

Biblically speaking Sarah Palin is mistaken. Her's is an over-individualized understanding of sin. Indeed the person who is primarily responsible is the actor. But we also see in scripture a vibrant group understanding.

Notice that the Lord's Prayer is all collective language. It is not "My Father in heaven...." or "Forgive me my sins..."
Our Father in heaven,
may your name be kept holy.
May your Kingdom come soon.
May your will be done on earth,
as it is in heaven.
Give us today the food we need,
and forgive us our sins,
as we have forgiven those who sin against us.
And don’t let us yield to temptation,
but rescue us from the evil one. ~ Matthew 6:9-13 (NLT)
The collective nature of responsibility is seen quite clearly in the Old Testament, too, where there are whole societies condemned because of community participation in evil. Occasionally the prophets condenm individuals for their sins -- usually rulers. But more often judgment (and forgiveness) is declared toward the people as a whole -- the group.

For example, Hosea 14:1-4 (TNIV) --
Return, Israel, to the LORD your God.
Your sins have been your downfall!
Take words with you
and return to the LORD.
Say to him:
“Forgive all our sins
and receive us graciously,
that we may offer the fruit of our lips.
Assyria cannot save us;
we will not mount warhorses.
We will never again say ‘Our gods’
to what our own hands have made,
for in you the fatherless find compassion.”
“I will heal their waywardness
and love them freely,
for my anger has turned away from them.
Note the collective language -- them, their, your, our, us.

In other words, we're in it together. When one person acts monstrously we together as a society share in some of the responsibility. We have failed in our collective responsibility toward that person and his victims.

This in no way shifts blame from the individual but acknowledges that responsibility cannot be that of an individual alone (contrary to anti-Christian Enlightenment thinking). Collectively we have failed Jared Loughner and his victims.

Perhaps more scandalous than the inexplicable national debt, we have created a society where an individual can act alone. To save a few dollars and make life easier for us, the wealthier individuals in society, we systematically dismantled a government-supported mental health system which 30 years ago would have more quickly intervened -- preemptively. We placed rights in front of responsibility when it came to gun access. We put the school system in a position where they could not share their concerns with family and other agencies because of a student's right to privacy. And we have embraced a kind of political rhetoric which publicly dehumanizes the opposition through baleful bantering. Together we have allowed this to happen. And together we share the responsibility.

So, what do we do about it? How can we shift the course and improve the situation for future generations?
  • We have to consciously reject the over-individualized thinking that came to us through the so-called
    Enlightenment. Descartes was misleading.

  • We need to be quick to embrace responsibility for the problems around us. If there are issues in the neighborhood we can't just blame an individual or a group. It is too easy for cocooned individuals to gripe and to expect their words to magically fix things.

  • We can start to use an old African response to the question, "How are you?" The answer is, "I'm well -- if you are well."

  • We can memorize the great commandment (which Scot McKnight calls the Jesus Creed) --
Jesus replied, “The most important one is Israel, listen! Our God is the one Lord, and you must love the Lord your God with your whole heart, with all your being, with your whole mind, and with all your strength. The second is this, You will love your neighbor as yourself. No other commandment is greater than these. ~ Mark 12:29-31 (CEB)
  • We can reintroduce the collective confession of sin into worship.
Almighty God, creator of all,
you marvelously made us in your image;
but we have corrupted ourselves
and damaged your likeness
by rejecting your love and hurting our neighbors.
We have done wrong and neglected to do right.
We are sincerely sorry and heartily repent of our sins.
Cleanse us and forgive us by the sacrifice of your Son;
remake us and lead us by your Spirit, the Comforter.
We ask this through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
~ Our Modern Services, Anglican Church of Kenya, p. 78 
We can and must start to take responsibility not only for ourselves but for those around us.


Tom said...

So does this apply to the abotion issue also? How about the White supremist or Jim Jones Ifd this is true today, then why would we not be taking stronger action against these things? I'm not a Palin fan, but trying to pin this on her is just wrong.

Brad Boydston said...

I'm not quite sure what you mean, "pin this on her." Pin what on her? I'm simply saying that her understanding of sin is too narrow. Indeed, we bear some collective responsibility for white supremacy and Jim Jones. And we turn from and repent of our failures with these people.

Beth B said...

"...the forces that divide us are not as strong as those that unite us." --Barak Obama, speech at University of Arizona, 1-12-11

"In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world." --John 16:33

Tom said...

Many have been using Palin's adds to try and say that she is somehow responsible for this guy going off. I think that has been a sad chapter in this whole terrible incident.From the first hours after the shooting until today there are many placing the blame on her. While I understand that we need to work out many of these things, we will never get rid of all of the evil in the hearts of people. Evil was there all the way back to Cain and Abel. Was Abel somehow responsible? Brad, we can only act within our own sphere of infuence. We can only speak out when someone listens. At some point, there will always be someone who goes off his nut. This is a fallen world.

Brad Boydston said...

I was merely commenting on her public statement and the theology of sin that it revealed. I was not saying anything about her individual culpability.

You're right. You as an individual can only act within your sphere of influence. But my point is that responsibility does not rest solely with individuals. We have to tune into the corporate nature of sin and responsibility. So we each ask ourselves, have I contributed to the social angst through irresponsible dehumanizing rhetoric. Am I acting with radical kindness toward those with whom I disagree? Am I being short-sighted or selfish in the policies that I support -- concerned more about my rights than corporate health?